Discussion:
qmail-ldap + SPF
Rodolfo Zappa
2006-02-23 02:45:05 UTC
Permalink
Hi all,

There is a plan to include SPF support in qmail-LDAP patch?
--
Cordialmente,

Rodolfo Zappa
***@archive.com.br
(21) 9379-1044
(21) 2567-1842
Scott Ryan
2006-02-23 06:22:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rodolfo Zappa
Hi all,
There is a plan to include SPF support in qmail-LDAP patch?
I have fixed up the qmail-spp patch for qmail-ldap20060201 which enables
support for an SPF plugin. http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/

I have sent the maintainer the diff for the latest version of qmail-ldap so
hopefully he will add to his site in the near future. If not, I can post it
here.
--
slr,

ISP Systems Specialist
Telkom Internet
#qmail, #qmail-ldap & #mandriva@ irc.freenode.net

This message has been made from 100% recycled bits.

----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT/MU/E d? s+:+ a- C++++>+++++ USL++++$ P++++ !E(---)W+@ !N
o?(--) K? !w(---) O- M+ V PS+@ PE Y-- PGP++>+++ !t(---) !5 !X
R-- !tv b(++) DI++ !D(----) G+++>++++ e++>* h----(*) r+++ y++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Rodolfo Zappa
2006-02-23 12:14:28 UTC
Permalink
Please, post here.

Cordialmente,

Rodolfo Zappa
***@archive.com.br
(21) 9379-1044
(21) 2567-1842
Post by Scott Ryan
Post by Rodolfo Zappa
Hi all,
There is a plan to include SPF support in qmail-LDAP patch?
I have fixed up the qmail-spp patch for qmail-ldap20060201 which enables
support for an SPF plugin. http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/
I have sent the maintainer the diff for the latest version of qmail-ldap so
hopefully he will add to his site in the near future. If not, I can post it
here.
Scott Ryan
2006-02-23 13:16:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rodolfo Zappa
Please, post here.
Cordialmente,
Rodolfo Zappa
(21) 9379-1044
(21) 2567-1842
Post by Scott Ryan
Post by Rodolfo Zappa
Hi all,
There is a plan to include SPF support in qmail-LDAP patch?
I have fixed up the qmail-spp patch for qmail-ldap20060201 which enables
support for an SPF plugin. http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/
I have sent the maintainer the diff for the latest version of qmail-ldap
so hopefully he will add to his site in the near future. If not, I can
post it here.
Here it is.
--
slr,

ISP Systems Specialist
Telkom Internet
#qmail, #qmail-ldap & #mandriva@ irc.freenode.net

This message has been made from 100% recycled bits.

----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT/MU/E d? s+:+ a- C++++>+++++ USL++++$ P++++ !E(---)W+@ !N
o?(--) K? !w(---) O- M+ V PS+@ PE Y-- PGP++>+++ !t(---) !5 !X
R-- !tv b(++) DI++ !D(----) G+++>++++ e++>* h----(*) r+++ y++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Ed Cates
2006-03-06 21:23:16 UTC
Permalink
Scott,

Does this patch exibit the no-relaying bug you posted on the qmail-spp-general
list at sourceforge? I had this problem earlier getting qmail-spp to work
with qmail-ldap.

Thanks,
--Ed
Post by Scott Ryan
Post by Rodolfo Zappa
Please, post here.
Cordialmente,
Rodolfo Zappa
(21) 9379-1044
(21) 2567-1842
Post by Scott Ryan
Post by Rodolfo Zappa
Hi all,
There is a plan to include SPF support in qmail-LDAP patch?
I have fixed up the qmail-spp patch for qmail-ldap20060201 which
enables support for an SPF plugin. http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/
I have sent the maintainer the diff for the latest version of
qmail-ldap so hopefully he will add to his site in the near future. If
not, I can post it here.
Here it is.
Scott Ryan
2006-03-06 21:44:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ed Cates
Scott,
Does this patch exibit the no-relaying bug you posted on the
qmail-spp-general list at sourceforge? I had this problem earlier getting
qmail-spp to work with qmail-ldap.
My apologies... Yes it does. Here is the fixed version

<snip>
--
slr,

ISP Systems Specialist
Telkom Internet
#qmail, #qmail-ldap & #mandriva@ irc.freenode.net

"Windows?? You mean the thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a
sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a
four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't
stand one bit of competition? Oh, that..." -- Lee Clarke

This message has been made from 100% recycled bits.

----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT/MU/E d? s+:+ a- C++++>+++++ USL++++$ P++++ !E(---)W+@ !N
o?(--) K? !w(---) O- M+ V PS+@ PE Y-- PGP++>+++ !t(---) !5 !X
R-- !tv b(++) DI++ !D(----) G+++>++++ e++>* h----(*) r+++ y++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Ed Cates
2006-03-06 22:10:01 UTC
Permalink
Much thanks, Scott!

One last question: You haven't noticed any other problems with RELAYCLIENT
settings with the change to the SPP code? I realize it was just one line,
but I'm just trying to be cautious.

Thanks again,
--Ed
Post by Scott Ryan
Post by Ed Cates
Scott,
Does this patch exibit the no-relaying bug you posted on the
qmail-spp-general list at sourceforge? I had this problem earlier
getting qmail-spp to work with qmail-ldap.
My apologies... Yes it does. Here is the fixed version
<snip>
Scott Ryan
2006-03-07 05:56:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ed Cates
Much thanks, Scott!
One last question: You haven't noticed any other problems with RELAYCLIENT
settings with the change to the SPP code? I realize it was just one line,
but I'm just trying to be cautious.
No, we have not noticed any further issues. We are not an open relay and we
now no longer reject mails because of relaying denied. I have been testing
this for a couple of weeks now and so far so good!.
It looks to me (and I'm no programmer - not C anyway!) that there is an
incorrect decision upon the relayclient env attribute. But the good people
from spp who are for more intelligent than I on these matters are
investigating....

Thanks.
Post by Ed Cates
Thanks again,
--Ed
Post by Scott Ryan
Post by Ed Cates
Scott,
Does this patch exibit the no-relaying bug you posted on the
qmail-spp-general list at sourceforge? I had this problem earlier
getting qmail-spp to work with qmail-ldap.
My apologies... Yes it does. Here is the fixed version
<snip>
--
slr,

ISP Systems Specialist
Telkom Internet
#qmail, #qmail-ldap & #mandriva@ irc.freenode.net

"Windows?? You mean the thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a
sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a
four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't
stand one bit of competition? Oh, that..." -- Lee Clarke

This message has been made from 100% recycled bits.

----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT/MU/E d? s+:+ a- C++++>+++++ USL++++$ P++++ !E(---)W+@ !N
o?(--) K? !w(---) O- M+ V PS+@ PE Y-- PGP++>+++ !t(---) !5 !X
R-- !tv b(++) DI++ !D(----) G+++>++++ e++>* h----(*) r+++ y++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Loading...